I recently attended a course called “Presenting with Confidence“, delivered by Steve Herzberg. Steve is a teriffic bloke, and is someone I would describe as “keeping it real” – his style of delivery is guaranteed to have you laughing, and learning. I mean this seriously: the good thing about Steve’s course is the relaxed and confident manner in which he presents his material – he’s throroughly prepared, and the printed material you receive is professionally produced and rich with content. There’s a great interview with Steve here you can watch and see for yourself here just how well he communicates.
Steve and I often discuss the business value of using “social networking” tools, and we have had some excellent debate about the value of these tools in a business context. One such tool I believe in passionately is Twitter, and I was explaining to Steve the increase in “live tweeting” at an event or conference, and how this is transforming the behaviour of both speakers and attendees at these conferences, and adding enormous value to attendees and others interested in the event. For more on the concept of “live tweeting” have a read of “Live Tweeting: bird-brained or brilliant”
Some interesting questions arose during my discussion with Steve about the value of live-tweeting, including:
– is it distracting for the presenter (who doesn’t get to meet the eyes of their audience who are all typing away)?
– is it distracting for the audience, because their attention is diverted from the content being delivered to the rest of the “Twitter stream”?
– does it demonstrates a lack of respect for the speaker, who deserves your full attention?
Personally I have derived enormous value from the collective contribution of others “live tweeting””, particularly after the event when I can catch up on what other’s were saying. However I have also been distracted by it, and missed some of the content being delivered by the speaker. I can also appreciate that a speaker unaccustomed to their audience “live tweeting” could interpret this behavious as a lack of respect.
What is needed is education and understanding of current and emerging practices. Live tweeting is here to stay, many events now encourage it, and attendees are asking for it. The choice is yours to embrace it or not – I would encourage you to explain to others the benefits as you see them, and let them decide for themselves. There are no rules – but I believe we should be mindful of speakers and respect them, and show them the value that is being added (to their brand and their content)
What are your thoughts? Do you agree “live tweeting” an event adds value or not?
Twitter is an incredible tool for so many reasons. If you don’t know what Twitter is, watch this brief video to get a good overview (the video only skims the surface of it though)
A couple of reasons I enjoy using Twitter is it creates serendipities and builds community. Only today, we were celebrating our school’s 90-year anniversary. I noticed Malcolm Turnbull was in attendence so decided to send him a notice on Twitter (I am wondering if he is actually using it or employs a ghost writer. See for yourself by visiting his Twitter profile here.)
Here’s where the serendipitous moment occurred. Later in the day I checked my email and noticed that one of my Facebook friends (a past-teacher from the school who has relocated overseas) had “commented on my status” I realised immediately, that although this person wasn’t even on Twitter, that they had seen my status update which had automatically been sent to Facebook via the Twitter/Facebook application. This person was pleased to be reminded of the event I was attending and had said so in their comment. I was really chuffed by that moment, as it showed how something so simple as a Twitter update (sent from my phone with an investment of time of no more than a few moments) had put me back in touch with them, and caused them some happiness and fond memories.
Creating serendipities and building community – two good reasons you should be on Twitter.
Hey there folks, it’s been quite a while between posts, with Megan back at University studying full time, a busy work/family life, and Twitter, writing on my blogs has been affected. Not that I haven’t been spending time online – there’s plenty of good reason to do so, and Twitter is one of them.
Twitter? This site is increasingly becoming a daily port of call in my online travels. I joined this interesting social networking site a few months ago (hat tip to my mate Aaron Saikovski who first mentioned it to me over coffee late last year – Aaron will be presenting at the next SBTUG, and just announced he will be joining Microsoft from 4th July – congratulations Aaron.
I find Twitter fascinating because it connects me in to a “conversation” – you get to control who you listen to, talk to, and it happens in near real-time. If you “listen” to people you are interested in, it can yield great benefits – access to current breaking news, interesting links, and new connections with people across diverse geographies.
It reminds me of LinkedIn Answers but “turbo-charged” in that you’re likely to get responses to a question in minutes rather than hours.
I recommend you visit http://www.twitter.com/ and create an account. Even before doing that, check out this post which provides an easy-to-read guide to Twitter.
For an even quicker overview of Twitter, check out the CommonCraft video below here.
Recently people have been talking about http://www.plurk.com/ – Plurk seems to be similar to Twitter, only more graphical in that it shows posts on a timeline, with categories for each post designed to show a posts intention or mood in greater clarity. One to watch for now – if anyone has tried it please let me know.